rkhullar1Bull, he knew something in 2005 when everyone else found out later. Unacceptable. If you know somethBull, he knew something in 2005 when everyone else found out later. Unacceptable. If you know something ahead of time. Not only that. Lisa marie Pressley she is not a professional, Germaine not a professional, Brook Sheilds not a professional. Deepak Chopra Professional. He has told people things that I learned as a child in Hinduism. People pay 10s of thousands of dollars to learn something my parents taught me. If Micheal Jackson is that close to him and I am using the words Deepak Chopra put out there when he was interviewed then cleary he has some explaining to do. Maybe he is not guilty of a crime, but ethically there a lot more I want to know. Deepak Chopra shouldn't have said a word if he truly didn't want people asking questions. If he was doing it to get attention then thats a disgrace to Indian people and its just bad period. Micheal Jackson was the reason you are even close to him.See more
Margaret SowaRajesh,
Can you, if just for a second, put aside your assumptions about other people's ability orRajesh,
Can you, if just for a second, put aside your assumptions about other people's ability or inability to help Michael and just accept that there is much you just don't know about the relationship Deepak Chopra had with Michael and the extend of help offered?
From the distance, it's easy to assume you'd know how to go about any given situation. It is usually a delusion. Most of us do the best we can and know how. In the end you can only help the ones that are ready to get helped anyway.
Best,
MargaretSee more
RAJESH KHULLARNo I think he could have done something. What I don't understand is he knew in 2005. He could have gNo I think he could have done something. What I don't understand is he knew in 2005. He could have gone to the Medical Board through his lawyer. He could have invited the Jacksons let Micheal get suspicious and open his mouth on his own. Micheal could not have kicked his family out of Deepak's house. After 2005 why was there even contact between Deepak's kids and Micheal even up to the months before he died. They knew it. They could have gotten Micheal out of his house and get him some help. I just dont' accept it. I want to know why Deepak Chopra then if he refused to give the drugs, Micheal calls him back 3 weeks later he didnt' say I am worried check yourself in and let me watch over this. I am sorry, it was because of Micheal that Deepak Chopra got the connections to do this stuff. I never knew who he was till M icheal introduced him to the whole world. No disrespect to Deepak Chopra but I know a ton of Indian doctors with as much knowledge and integrity as he has. He owed it to Micheal all he had do was try something. You mean to tell me Micheal doesn't listen to him. Grace was the nanny because Deepak suggested it to Micheal. I am telling you if Micheal called him back 3 weeks later. He would have listened eventually. To sit there let him do it, then he goes to Bahrain forget about him then when he comes back its too late. See in 2005 Micheal was not as deep as in 2007. That was the time to act. I just don't understand and I think Deepak Chopra needs to tell more about this at least what was his relationship to the Jacksons. That is what I am curious about, because if you have hung around Indians for which I am one we are very family oriented. Even as much as a couple of weeks ago, I heard Gotham Chopra saying I am glad to be at Neverland and meet Germaine. They both were doing an interview with Larry King together. I am curious why.See more
Lia CThank you Toni!
I am sure this is echoed by most here. God helps those that help themselves?! I thThank you Toni!
I am sure this is echoed by most here. God helps those that help themselves?! I think so. It is for each of us to figure our own journey. RIP MJ.See more
Toni Lee StephanIf you've ever loved an addict you would know that it is neither your duty nor in your power/controlIf you've ever loved an addict you would know that it is neither your duty nor in your power/control to help them. It is very difficult to help people who are self-destructive and I feel certain you would know this if you'd ever had the experience.
I don't speak for Deepak, but I know he wasn't 'responsible' for Michael. We are all responsible for ourselves and accpountable for our actions. Blame only serves to absolve us of our responsibility to change our own lives and takes away our ability to act.
You should forgive Michael and also let go any resentments you hold towards Deepak...
Wishing you well on your journey!See more
Recent comments