Question:
What do you think of J.Krishnamurti's "idea" that meditation cannot be taught?
Also doesn't conforming to methods of meditation (TM & PM) laid down remove the whole point of meditation?
Answer:
Krishnamurti’s comment has the valuable effect of making us look at a deeper understanding of meditation. Obviously on a mundane level of interpretation, meditation has be successfully taught for thousands of years and continues to be.
I think the deeper point is that when the mind goes beyond its conditioning and experiences its own pure nature during meditation, that is not something that one does or can be taught, in the sense that it is you simply being you without anything else. To try to do anything or to try to apply information that you have been taught would only complicate and get in the way of the singularity of the experience. So the actual experience of one’s essential nature is not mediated nor can it be mediated with any other mental content.
But when one is taught to meditate using a mantra or any other vehicle, the point is clearly made that the mantra is simply a tool that allows the natural tendency of the mind to go beyond itself and experience its true nature. It is useful to take us out of our conditioned awareness that is habituated to localized sensory awareness, to be neutral. In that neutrality, then innate pull of consciousness to expand into self-awareness is what then accomplishes the transcendence. That part of meditation is not taught it happens by virtue of our inner nature. However, being taught the use of a mantra sets up the preconditions that make that experience more available. Without learning to meditate, very few individuals are lucky enough to be able to regularly experience their unconditioned self.
Love,
Deepak
Recent comments